top of page

The Books In Question

  • Writer: Shane Bilyeu
    Shane Bilyeu
  • Oct 27, 2024
  • 1 min read

This case involves two literary works, Huckleberry Finn, and A Rose for Emily. Both of these books have had a history of controversy due to their content. The text of Huckleberry Finn contains the n-word 212 times, and A Rose for Emily contains the n-word four times, and for these reasons, these books have been controversial for their content. A main aspect of these books touch on slavery, that include a variety of these racial terms. The constant use of these words, especially with the context of slavery has made some students feel uncomfortable and fueled lots of debate.

When analyzing these books within their historical context, it is important to recognize that these were products of their time. These words were more socially acceptable during their time when they were published: Huckleberry Finn published in 1880 and set in 1830-1840 and A Rose for Emily in 1930. Slavery was officially abolished on December 18, 1865, when the constitution was ratified, however this event did not stop the consistent racism towards African-Americans. There was still a prevalent racial hierarchy trying to be withheld in society, and with that the use of this language was still being used very persistently.

In addition, both novels illustrate a reflection of their retrospective societies, demonstrating the struggle of race, class, and societal/individual morality. Huck, the main character of Huckleberry Finn, displays his moral dilemmas while grasping the present norms of the time. In A Rose for Emily themes include isolation and self-change, while being in the environment of the Old South and it's contextual difficulties.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Works Cited

“The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.” Huckleberry Finn Full PDF , contentserver.adobe.com/store/books/HuckFinn.pdf . Accessed 20 Oct....

 
 
 
The Group

Ultimately we unanimously agree with the ruling set by the 9th District court, We concur that the required reading of these texts was not...

 
 
 
Hayden Mills

While I can understand Monteiro's points, I have to ultimately agree with the decision made by the 9th district court. I agree with...

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page